<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MXML Or Actionscript?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arielsommeria.com/blog/2009/03/31/mxml-or-actionscript/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arielsommeria.com/blog/2009/03/31/mxml-or-actionscript/</link>
	<description>Web Applications and Open Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:17:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tink</title>
		<link>http://arielsommeria.com/blog/2009/03/31/mxml-or-actionscript/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Tink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arielsommeria.com/blog/?p=90#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Yeah its much quicker, and nice and tidy.

It also easier to set up bindings, implement states, transitions and effects.

Defo worth getting in to. Once your familiar with it, you never look back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah its much quicker, and nice and tidy.</p>
<p>It also easier to set up bindings, implement states, transitions and effects.</p>
<p>Defo worth getting in to. Once your familiar with it, you never look back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://arielsommeria.com/blog/2009/03/31/mxml-or-actionscript/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arielsommeria.com/blog/?p=90#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Hi Tink,
Is it really better than writing your view in actionscript though? Unless you use nesting, I still don&#039;t think so.
Ariel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tink,<br />
Is it really better than writing your view in actionscript though? Unless you use nesting, I still don&#8217;t think so.<br />
Ariel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tink</title>
		<link>http://arielsommeria.com/blog/2009/03/31/mxml-or-actionscript/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Tink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arielsommeria.com/blog/?p=90#comment-76</guid>
		<description>We use MXML for views</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We use MXML for views</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://arielsommeria.com/blog/2009/03/31/mxml-or-actionscript/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arielsommeria.com/blog/?p=90#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Hi Kris,
thanks for the tip I had never heard of this approach. So I looked for it and found this which seems a good writeup: http://blog.vivisectingmedia.com/2008/04/the-flex-code-behind-pattern/
I like the idea but I&#039;ll have to give a try in a real world situation. That would make a follow-up post I guess.
Ariel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kris,<br />
thanks for the tip I had never heard of this approach. So I looked for it and found this which seems a good writeup: <a href="http://blog.vivisectingmedia.com/2008/04/the-flex-code-behind-pattern/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.vivisectingmedia.com/2008/04/the-flex-code-behind-pattern/</a><br />
I like the idea but I&#8217;ll have to give a try in a real world situation. That would make a follow-up post I guess.<br />
Ariel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Hofmans</title>
		<link>http://arielsommeria.com/blog/2009/03/31/mxml-or-actionscript/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Hofmans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arielsommeria.com/blog/?p=90#comment-69</guid>
		<description>I really like code behind pattern for my flex pages. Usually gives me best of both worlds, no -tag in the mxml, all the event handlers in the base class, nice and pretty :)

And it keeps all the layout declared in mxml. Hell you can even give the mxml to some designer whithout having to worry about him completely messing up the page!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like code behind pattern for my flex pages. Usually gives me best of both worlds, no -tag in the mxml, all the event handlers in the base class, nice and pretty <img src='http://arielsommeria.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And it keeps all the layout declared in mxml. Hell you can even give the mxml to some designer whithout having to worry about him completely messing up the page!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

